I do use Luminar and photolab ( they do the best noise reduction ). A lot of images are in it and I know them well enough for what I do. Luminar's catalogue features are pretty basic at the moment, but it's a great plugin."Īnd finally, Rob chimes in: "I am sticking with LR /PS. I think Photos is better than many people think and good enough for most. However, Capture One meets most of my needs although the catalogue isn't quite there. Lightroom CC and Photos I mainly use to support mobile devices."Īndrew, a former Aperture user, writes: "Nothing has quite replaced Aperture. I think things like Luminar are interesting from a processing perspective but it's difficult to find a time to experiment. My workflow is built around Lightroom now and that is my biggest barrier to change. I still miss the organisational abilities of Aperture. Since I've been a Lightroom user since its first beta, I don't think I'll ever change as long as Adobe keeps up its current rate of advancing the platform."Īndrew adds: "Lightroom Classic is my go to now but I use Capture Pro for my my Fuji pictures. I also use Lightroom Mobile, Luminar and Aurora HDR. While Lightroom (formerly Lightroom CC) gets used mostly so I can check what's going on in the Creative Cloud. Apple's Photos app is used primarily to share images with my Apple centric family. I use Photoshop if and when the image requires PS's advanced editing capabilities. I think Charles sums up the position of many photographers these days: "I primarily us Lightroom Classic to manage and edit my images.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |